GDPR Fines in 2025: Who Got Hit, Why It Happened, and What Brands Must Learn
2025 has been a record-breaking year for GDPR enforcement. Regulators across Europe have made one thing clear: no company is too big – or too small – to be fined.
So far, GDPR fines have crossed €3 billion in 2025 alone, sending a clear signal that privacy laws aren’t optional – they’re enforceable.
Let’s break down the biggest cases, why they mattered, and what every organization should take away.
Meta [Facebook] – €1.2 Billion
- The violation: Meta transferred EU user data to the U.S. without sufficient safeguards under GDPR’s rules for cross-border transfers.
- The issue: The Court of Justice of the EU has repeatedly ruled that simply moving data to the U.S. isn’t enough. Companies must ensure equivalent protections to EU standards.
- The lesson: Privacy Shield is dead, and SCCs (Standard Contractual Clauses) aren’t a silver bullet unless backed by robust technical and legal safeguards.
- The violation: Using targeted advertising without valid, freely given, and easily withdrawn consent.
- The issue: Amazon leaned on “implied” or “forced” consent through design nudges, which the EU considers manipulative.
- The lesson: Consent must be specific, informed and reversible. Anything less is non-compliant.
- The violation: Failing to guarantee EU user data transferred to China would be protected and not being transparent with users.
- The issue: Regulators found TikTok didn’t provide enough clarity on where user data was going or how it was safeguarded.
- The lesson: Transparency is non-negotiable. Vague privacy notices = legal risk.
- The violation: A SIM swap attack exposed identity data.
- The issue: Insufficient security checks during number portability left customers vulnerable.
- The lesson: GDPR isn’t just about consent – security controls are equally critical.
- The violation: Mishandling health data by subcontractors.
- The issue: Healthcare providers are responsible for ensuring their partners also meet GDPR obligations.
- The lesson: Third-party risk is real. You’re accountable for your vendors’ compliance.
What Do These Fines Tell Us?
- Consent & transparency remain top priorities.
Both Amazon and TikTok were penalized because users weren’t fully informed or empowered to make real choices. - Cross-border data transfers are high-risk.
Meta’s fine highlights the policy clash around U.S. – EU data flows. Without strong safeguards, companies will be exposed. - Size doesn’t shield you.
Vodafone and Marina Salud may not be tech giants, but regulators still hit them. Smaller organizations aren’t invisible. - GDPR sets the global bar.
Even if you’re a U.S.-based brand, collecting EU user data means playing by EU rules – or paying the price.
Lessons For Brands
If you’re building internationally – or even just collecting EU traffic – here’s what to do:
- Audit your consent flows. Are users freely choosing, or are you nudging?
- Strengthen cross-border protection. SCCs + encryption + contractual safeguards are must-haves.
- Manage third-party risk. Your vendors’ non-compliance = your liability.
- Treat privacy as trust-building. Compliance avoids fines, but transparency wins loyalty.
GDPR fines aren’t just numbers – they’re case studies in what happens when consent, transparency, and accountability are ignored.
GDPR isn’t just “Europe’s problem.” It’s setting the global compliance standard – and shaping consumer expectations everywhere.
At Privacy Pillar, we help organizations go beyond “avoiding fines” and build privacy-first strategies that foster trust. Because in 2025, trust isn’t just compliance – it’s your competitive edge.
